Archive

Books


Gareth Roberts, I apologise. Last week, I confidently predicted that I would loath this episode with a passion. I thought that given his past record of churning out that this episode would be the same. That the crowd-pleasing inclusion of Corden Bleu would be a senseless, irritating addition. How wrong I was. This was, despite a few issues, an entertaining, jolly romp. Just the sort of light relief needed before we plunge head-first into the high-octane thrills of the finale. Hit the link for my full review of The Lodger, and, as always, strong spoilers from the very beginning.
Read More

If you’re reading this blog, chances are you’ve read a fantasy novel or two. I’ve read far more than I should have, and indeed, am currently in the process of writing one. It’s not as arduous as it sounds, but it’s time-consuming all right, and I’ve noticed a few mistakes that keep being made, by others as well as myself (although I try my best to mitigate against them. With than in mind, here (in no particular order) are my top 4 ways to go wrong in a fantasy novel. To make this more interesting, I’ll frame it in the context of my favourite literary whipping boy, Eragon, because, as Bill Watterson said, things are funnier when specific than when generalised. By the way, for a very funny deconstruction of the book, I recommend Impish Idea’s ‘Everything Wrong With Eragon‘, which is much funnier that this has any hope of being.
Read More

Or, how not to write an overlong, tedious blog post

When I was ten, and really starting to get into Doctor Who, I read a book called Interference, (actually, two books) by a guy called Lawrence Miles. It was good, but in retrospect, not really a book for a ten-year-old, burdened as it was with subtext and subtlety, and abstract storytelling devices that I can recall confusing me a little. Earlier today, I was reading a review of Victory of the Daleks on Behind the Sofa, which linked to a review that this chap had done of Interference, from which I somehow got a link to a rather long interview with Mr Miles (from before the new series) in which he made some rather… unflattering comments about some other Doctor Who book writers (or at least discussed having done so in the past). I sought out his blog, which I would thoroughly recommend to anyone. It’s a little odd, not least because he puts up reviews and then takes them down again rather quickly (for what reason I’m not entirely sure). While I may not always agree with him, he always substantiates his arguments and puts them across with great eloquence and verbal alacrity. And if you think I can be overly cynical and acerbic, this guy is Charlie Brooker-scale cynical and acerbic, (who writes posts longer than some of mine) but it has more sting, because it’s tinged with bitterness.
Read More

Brisingr front cover.

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.” 1 Corinthians 13:11

I am postmodern enough to understand the pretentious ramifications of beginning with a Bible quotation, and also to use the word ‘ramifications’. And to point out the fact that I have just done this. I’ll stop now. Anyway, here is my review of Brisingr, by Christopher Paolini, and, I suppose, the whole Inheritance Cycle. Oh, spoilers, by the way.

To understand my perspective on this whole thing, I must begin about four or five years ago, when I read the first book in the Inheirtance Cycle, Eragon. For those of you who don’t know,it concerns a boy who finds a dragon egg and becomes a Jedi Dragon Rider. Anyway, I read this when I was much, much younger, and as a result, loved it. I forced my father to read it when he was ill, and he hated it. It took me some time to work out why that was. Children can forgive poor writing if there’s a good story. Hell, they’ll forgive a bad story, if it seems exciting enough and there are dragons. An example of a poorly written good story would be Harry Potter, at least until Harry turns into a twat. A badly written bad story would be the Inheiritance Cycle.

Maybe, though, it’s not bad. I’m not sure whether something so derivative can be considered ‘good’ or ‘bad’. The story concerns a boy of uncertain parentage, who lives with his aunt and uncle on a farm near a backwater town. He meets the local crazy old man, who turns out to have been a member of an ancient order of knights who guarded civilisation from evil. The old man gives the boy the sword that belongs to the boy’s father (one of the knights who, influenced by an evil guy who wants to reign supreme, kills all of the old knights but is defeated by the old man, who gives the boy to his uncle and retreats to a nearby village to watch him grow, until the point where the story picks up.

Now, admiteddly I ommitted a few details, like a dragon, and what transpired in the later books regarding the farmboy’s (Eragon is his name, I just didn’t use it for the purposes of the analogy) parentage, but even a moron can see the story has been lifted bodily from Star Wars. I realise that Star Wars had some quite distinct influences but really. Chris Paolini must have watched A New Hope before sitting down to plan it out or something.Oh, and by the way, the second part of the series invoves the farmboy going to a jungle planet to train with the old master of the order, but he has to leave abruptly, in order to save his friends…

He probably skim-read The Lord of the Rings too. Proud elves, stubborn dwarves, Orcs (inventively re-named Urgals). dragons, and a sprawling world replete with dwarf-filled mountains, elf-filled forests, Orc-filled plains and a plucky group of humans who triumph against the odds. Who did Paolini think he was fooling? He got a free ride because his parents own a printing agency, and now he has Tolkien-esque pretentions? He hasn’t grasped why Tolkein was so good- his universe was meticulously crafted, based on languages (he was a language scholar, after all) of his own invention. Elven, for example, was based on Finnish and Welsh. By comparison, Paolini’s Alageasia is something a seven year old scrawled on a bit of paper (same goes for the whole book really).

Now i’ve gotten that out of the way, I can return to the novel at hand. The plot picks up where the last book, Eldest, left off – Roran (Eragon’s cousin) has had his wife kidnapped by RingwraithsRa’Zac, and he and Eragon set off and find them, kill them, save Wifey, and …urghhh. I can’t go on. The plot is about as well thought out as the plot to 50 Cent: Blood on the Sand, and Paolini’s smugness seems to have seeped into the paper somehow. That little shit has the unmitigated temerity to reference Doctor Who in this book. Watch this and you may begin to understand. I also have a problem with the fact that he’s slipped into a habit of fantasy writers. This is to crowbar in a device that wasn’t mentioned at all previously, either because it was a ‘secret’ or because no-one knew about it, but really because the writer needs a quick and dirty solution to whatever corner they’ve painted themselves into this time. In this case, a hitherto unknown fact is revealed: Dragons can sic up their souls and give them to people, and the Big Bad has found a way to use this energy for himself, ahahahaha. No, really. This is actually what happened.

Anyway, this has been going on for quite long enough, so I’ll wrap it up. Brisingr is a poorly written mess, thick enough to use in a smash and grab raid because of all the “protagonists” loudly soliliquise their every motivation in a stilted, irritating manner, and then laugh at their own unfunny jokes. The story is bromidic and tiresome, and the author consumes pages of the book with story-irrelavant material that only serve to cement this book in my mind and boring, mindless, self-indulgant twaddle (like this review).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.